Valuing quality in mental healthcare Valuing quality in mental healthcare: A discrete choice experiment eliciting preferences from mental healthcare service users, mental healthcare professionals and the general population

Funded by

The Health Foundation Logo

11 May 2022

Published journal: Social Science & Medicine

About 2 mins to read


High and sustained healthcare quality is important worldwide, though health policy may prioritise the achievement of certain aspects of quality over others. This study determines the relative importance of different aspects of mental healthcare quality to different stakeholders by eliciting preferences in a UK sample using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). DCE attributes were generated using triangulation between policy documents and mental healthcare service user and mental healthcare professional views, whilst ensuring attributes were measurable using available data.

Ten attributes were selected: waiting times; ease of access; person-centred care; co-ordinated approach; continuity; communication, capacity and resources; treated with dignity and respect; recovery focus; inappropriate discharge; quality of life (QoL). The DCE was conducted online (December 2018 to February 2019) with mental healthcare service users (n = 331), mental healthcare professionals (n = 510), and members of the general population (n = 1018).

Respondents’ choices were analysed using conditional logistic regression. Relative preferences for each attribute were generated using the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) with QoL as numeraire. Across all stakeholders, being treated with dignity and respect was of high importance. A coordinated approach was important across all stakeholders, whereas communication had higher relative importance for healthcare professionals and service users and ease of access had higher relative importance for the general population.

This implies that policy could be affected by the choice of whose preferences (service users, healthcare professionals or general population) to use, since this impacts on the relative value and implied ranking of different aspects of mental healthcare quality.

You might also like...

Newsletter feature

Let's talk differently about health: why framing matters

Newsletter feature

 Maria Castellina, Director of Impact at FrameWorks UK, explains why framing an issue differently...

Newsletter blog

We can't wait for government to act on health inequalities

Newsletter blog

Political instability has yet again got in the way of public health policy. What is certain is the...


How to talk about the building blocks of health


A communications toolkit showing people how to tell a more powerful story about health.

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

What can policymakers do to tackle the inverse care law? We analysed previous efforts to reduce inequity in the su…

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more